NuFace vs. MINI - What I do (and don't) like about each

NuFace vs. MINI

PROS & CONS OF THE CLAREBLEND MINI MICROCURRENT SYSTEM

10.jpg

CLAREBLEND MINI MICROCURRENT
PROS & CONS

I just did a round up of the two...

Here are my thoughts:

I've used several tools over the years...

-Suzanne Somers FACEMASTER

-NUFace

-Galvanic

-High Frequency (DERMAWAND)

Others...

Plus countless skincare creams, serums, and other "magic potions" (sound familiar?)

But honestly, I'm in LOVE with my MINI!

I know, I have to say that because I sell them, right?

NOPE.

I honestly love it.

It is, hands down, the BEST little firming tool I've ever used. That is why I promote it and recommend it completely.

Now, is it perfect?

NOPE.

Why?

Save 15 abp4.jpg

SAVE RIGHT NOW ON YOUR CLAREBLEND MINI MICROCURRENT


I don't like that it doesn't have a battery-option.

I always need to be near a plug or power source to use it.

It also has a cord - a nuisance, but not a biggie.

No power levels, either. But I usually only use high, so it doesn't really matter.

WHY DO I LOVE IT?

It works.

Period.

End of story.

It works fast and I SEE RESULTS right after using it.

Plus, it lasts.

The results stick around for a couple of days.

No, not permanent, but a nice lasting effect.

MICROCURRENT AT HOME

MICROCURRENT AT HOME

CLAREBLEND MINI PROS:

  • Works quickly to give you immediate, noticeable results

  • Hand-help, portable, easy to travel with

  • Inexpensive

  • Dual-probes closely mimic a professional-level treatment vs. larger probed devices

  • No zap, no sting, no pain


CLAREBLEND MINI CONS:

  • No battery - needs a power source / either wall adapter (sold separately) or a power source

  • No power levels - one level fits all

  • Corded device

Previous
Previous

Should microcurrent hurt (or does a zap mean it's working?)

Next
Next

Time Master Pro Results